Very best safest distance from the 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause issues for users.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. safe distance from cell tower for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to health.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.
Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more vulnerable to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
safe distance from cell tower is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. what is a safe distance from a cell tower are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.