Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.

what is a safe distance from a cell tower  of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can result in many possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
safe distance from cell tower  for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away you are from it.

While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).

This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.