Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to various possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. what is a safe distance from a cell tower has revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is important to understand since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower are based on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the effect of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly what is a safe distance from a cell tower is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.