Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?

Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.



what is a safe distance from a cell tower  are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
https://ctxt.io/2/AACQ88TtEg  is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one Gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas.  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.

Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther your location from the tower.

Although this may sound like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further far from antennas.

But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.